Although the mentor created the original version of the agreement, the mentor will give constructive feedback and contributions to the final design of the agreement with the mentor so that everyone feels responsible for the finished product. Both parties must participate in the refinement and ratification of the tutoring agreement, with both parties accountable. The innovative study by the EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research (ECAR) on the direction of computer science in higher education2 warns that the majority of information technology professionals surveyed believe that work in higher education is useful, but that the next generation of potential IT executives is in decline. The insurrators see the IT campus as a climate of freshness for innovation, but there is a lack of different workers. Perhaps most strikingly, they see the IOC`s career as too much personal commitment. This is particularly threatening, as more than a quarter of respondents planned to retire within five years or less, leaving a gaping need for new directions. The report contains two recommendations to mitigate this problem: the search for leaders in non-traditional places and the identification and management of promising candidates. These are all motivating and achievable courses for both employees and superiors in key areas such as sexual harassment, FMLA, diversity, communication, USERRA, recruitment and much more. The courses are kept up-to-date to reflect regulatory changes in the federal and federal governments and, in addition, BLR is constantly adding new programs.
Both the mentor and the mentor must take into account the perception of other people`s equity issues. While tutoring relationships between people of different generations, ethnicities, cultures, colours and special needs are encouraged in higher education, tutoring relationships between the sexes and people of the same sex are sometimes maintained at a different level, with potential criticism exacerbated by the power gap often associated with tutoring. In the end, distrust of these tutoring relationships is almost always based on misperceptions, bigotry, lack of knowledge or pettiness. The mentor and mentor must determine the risk and decide what is best for their professional growth. However, note that the examples cited in this chapter may not be suitable for members of certain religions or cultures in which tutoring relationships may be perceived as an inappropriate activity between persons of status, gender or other characteristics. The process of negotiating this agreement should be seen as a constructive dialogue between the tutoring partners. The mentor should establish the first draft tutoring agreement before meeting or talking to the mentor. By creating the agreement before the meeting with the mentor, the mentee proactively begins to take the relationship into her hands and gain a better understanding of what they want to learn. Different tutoring relationships generate a range of mentor types and styles. Mentors and mentors meet formally every quarter — and most also meet informally at least once a month.
They sign a contract that accepts their relationship responsibilities, for example. B when they meet and what they intend to accomplish. The biggest challenge for your partnership is the commitment of time.